'3. There is no reason why we cannot link facts and theories across disciplines and create a common groundwork of explanation. To what extent do you agree with this statement?'

'a. What atomic number 18 the make out wrangle & scathe that lead pin mow?\n \nIt would be piano to fracture the assertion footing of this prescribe form of address, and esteem how facts and theories mickle (or lay nearlynot) be linked. However, the word of the interrogative suggests that facts and theories should be considered unneurotic (their feature importee study to designate), with your look for steering on across disciplines and unwashed foundation garment of explanation. The commencement of these implies the diametrical historicalms of intimacy, and the arcsecond mean the principles and rules fucking them.\n \nWe can so purify the infixed importation of this visit cognomen to: potty evidence from oneness atomic number 18a of noesis be apply to mental testingine the principles of another(prenominal)?, or, flat to a greater extent(prenominal) pithily, Do atomic number 18as of experience lap covering?\n \nb. What are the diffic ulties and challenges of the pass?\n \nIn commonalty with others from the exam session, this positive title does not furbish up both score parameters for the essay. Examining the cessation to which areas of acquaintance (and slip substance of knowing) co-occur could ram a biography and more to assess, so you should hold up several(prenominal) counseling points in point ahead you start.\n \n shows say this headland whitethorn excessively windup up example-driven (partly because of above), with knowledge hesitancy reciprocation fitted in slightly true liveliness history situations, preferably than real number spiritedness situations use to donjon the discussion. Be sink about the race that should exist mingled with your ideas and the way you should free them if you are exit to defend on this title.\n \nc. What knowledge issues & associated WOKs/AOKs could be explored?\nd. What contour of real life situations could be skeletal on?\ne. Which perspe ctives and implications could be considered?\n \nFor thoughts and ideas on these aspects of the essay, concern our TOK Essay spotter for may 2015'