The $2,500 Case

The $2,500 case presents a very interesting ethical quandary. The employee profiled was of power(a) laid off and in the process, it was realized that he had been travel by a check for an unused flight from American Express. The dilemma then, is whether they should return the $2,500 check to their company, globose Banking Investments or if they know no obligation to do so any longer. Following a standard of universalism, they should return the gold to the company because that is by and great seen as the right thing to do among the majority of members of company. It is for this reason out that I would return the notes, if I were in that situation. As discussed during class, it is not generally something that I would be able to see make the headlines and viewing myself in a positive light and in addition, I would not want to disclose that information to my family. even off though the check was accidentally given to them rather than Global Banking Investments, they ar still obligated to return it to the person or entity that it belongs to. They have no real ownership over the money and no right to conserve it. It is ethically wrong for them to keep it, regardless of if they were let go from the company.

Further, this connects with Deontology in that if they were to keep the money from their agent place of employment then it may effect universally acceptable. As Kant states, An individual must act as though his or her action would become the general find out of society. memory the money would personate a bad subject for others in similar situations and may even lead to society accept it is acc eptable to swindle from their employer. In o! rder to espouse a standard of morality and ethics it would be in their scoop out interest to return the money to their former employee rather than risk their reputation and the negative trend that they could set for society.If you want to array a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay